Their on-screen dynamic was surprisingly intriguing. For all you Succession-heads out there, that means FitzGerald-who plays Roman’s sorta-girlfriend Tabitha on the HBO series-is flirting with Kendall Roy. But I think you’ll understand why O’Connor made the cut: You see, she goes undercover during the DNC protests by seducing Jerry Rubin, played by Jeremy Strong. Undercover Officer Daphne O’Connor (Caitlin FitzGerald)įitzGerald’s character is the only woman on this ranking-take it up with Sorkin, who famously struggles to write female characters-and including her at all even feels like a stretch. Gordon-Levitt does his best, but between The Trial of the Chicago 7 and the underwhelming Project Power, he recently just has me thinking that he needs to get some more worthwhile roles. This kind of political idealism-you don’t even want to know how Sorkin would script Donald Trump leaving the White House-feels even more tired in 2020. Sorkin is certainly within his rights to take some creative liberties, and the tweaks he makes to Schultz, described in real life as “the government’s pit bull,” are some of his biggest indulgences. Gordon-Levitt is handed a quintessential Sorkin role as the prosecuting attorney who slowly begins to grow a conscience and wonder What Exactly He’s Fighting For. But keep an eye out for Robbins: After a slimy supporting turn in The Assistant and a brief appearance as an incel possibly influenced by demons on the first season of CBS’s Evil, he’s shaping up to be an exciting utility player. Or, as Weiner put it in court, “This is the Academy Awards of protests, and as far as I’m concerned, it’s an honor just to be nominated.” Naturally, then, Robbins and Flaherty don’t have nearly as much meat on their roles as the rest of the ensemble. Weiner and Froines, the only defendants who were acquitted, understand that they were tried so that the government could seem somewhat lenient in its prosecution of the protesters. Lee Weiner (Noah Robbins) and John Froines (Daniel Flaherty) It’s a woeful performance in a film otherwise filled with great ones.īut hey, I’m sure Redmayne is a nice enough dude in real-Īh … never mind. Redmayne struggles to hide his English accent-it sounds like he’s going through the entire movie with a spoonful of peanut butter on the roof of his mouth. (If he deserved an Oscar for anything, it was his role in Jupiter Ascending.) But Redmayne does himself no favors here as Tom Hayden, an anti-war student organizer who’s one of the activists standing trial. I’ll be the first to admit I don’t really “get” Eddie Redmayne, whose Best Actor Oscar belies a rather unimpressive body of work. ‘The Trial of the Chicago 7’ Is Peak Aaron Sorkin 14. The Everything Aaron Sorkin Ranking Who Gets a Seat at the Table? Movie Lawyer Edition. (Well, as impartial as a self-professed Jeremy Strong superfan can be, but please don’t call for a mistrial.) These are your Trial of the Chicago 7 character rankings. But who stands out? Below, I’ll judge the performances by the most prominent members of Sorkin’s stacked ensemble and then deliver an impartial verdict. You can count on Sorkin, never one for subtlety, to draw parallels between the leftist factions who stood up to both militaristic police and a corrupt administration in the 1960s and the hell we’re living through today.Īs for the actors, you can count on The Trial of the Chicago 7’s star-studded cast to (mostly) deliver the goods. And what better setting for Sorkin’s most enduring tics than a politically charged courtroom? His latest movie, Netflix’s The Trial of the Chicago 7, follows the eight (more on that later) ’60s counterculture figures who were put on trial following the violent protests at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. To find yourself cast in a Sorkin project is to accept the inevitability of a-mile-a-minute dialogue and barn-burning idealistic speeches-a perfectly reasonable excuse to chew the hell out of some scenery. Aaron Sorkin must be an actor’s dream of an auteur.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |